February 23 2006 - Supreme Court rules against Post Office
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the U.S. Postal Service is not immune from lawsuits by people who tumble over mail left in their doorways.
In a 7-1 decision, the panel said a Pennsylvania woman could continue her lawsuit blaming the post office when she tripped over packages and letters left on her porch in 2001. The woman wants the U.S. Postal Service to pick up the tab for injuries in the fall.
But the federal government argued that the Postal Service was immune from lawsuits under a federal statute blocking suits involving the "loss, miscarriage or negligent transmission of letters."
Writing for a majority of the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy said the federal law was only intended to cover losses from mail that is misdirected, lost or damaged en route.
"Congress did not intend to immunize all postal activities," Kennedy wrote.
Kennedy noted that in a 1984 case, the Supreme Court said the Postal Service could be held liable for accidents involving its delivery trucks. Placing mail in a way that creates a risk of accidents is no different, Kennedy wrote.
Justice Clarence Thomas was the only dissenter in the case. Newly installed Justice Samuel Alito did not participate.
Government lawyers had implored the Supreme Court not to allow the Pennsylvania woman's suit to go forward because, they said, it would open the floodgates for slip-and-fall claims that would be hard to disprove.
At risk, the government said, was the efficiency of the entire mail system. Every day, the U.S. Postal Service delivers roughly 660 million pieces of mail to as many as 142 million mailboxes, doorsteps and other drop-offs.
Mail carriers often have to place packages on front porches or at doorsteps because they won't fit through mail slots or in boxes, Assistant Solicitor General Patricia Millett told the court during oral arguments in November. Millett argued the Postal Service was defenseless against slip-and-fall lawsuits, which can be filed long after someone trips over a package without any witnesses.
Gerry McKiernan, spokesman for the Postal Service, said that in the wake of the decision, carriers would receive a refresher course on delivery protocols.The information and materials on this Web site are provided for general informational purposes only and are not intended to be legal advice. We attempt to provide quality information, but the law changes frequently and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The information and materials provided are general in nature, and may not apply to a specific factual or legal circumstance. An attorney and client relationship should not be implied. Nothing on this Web site is intended to substitute for the advice of an attorney, therefore if you require legal advice please consult with a competent attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. All attorneys, unless otherwise noted in website, are not certified by Texas Board of Legal Specialization. See Terms of Use.

